How-to guide

How to Generate Research Ideas

Good projects almost always start with a good question. This guide walks you through how to spot researchable problems, turn them into clear questions, and choose ideas that are realistic for your stage.

Step 1: Start from real problems

The best ideas usually come from everyday clinical practice, not from trying to “be original” in abstract. Look for things that make you think:

  • “Why do we do it this way?”
  • “This seems inconsistent between teams or hospitals.”
  • “We’re not very good at <x> – could it be improved?”

Jot these thoughts down during placements, ward rounds, clinics, MDTs, or teaching sessions. Don’t judge the ideas yet – just capture them.

Step 2: Use patients, guidelines and audits as prompts

Patients and cases

Notice patterns: delayed diagnoses, frequent readmissions, common prescribing errors, or recurrent practical problems for patients or staff.

Guidelines and local practice

Compare local practice to NICE / national guidelines and trust protocols. Gaps between “what we should do” and “what actually happens” are classic starting points for audits and QI projects.

Previous audits and projects

Ask your department if there are old audits that need re-auditing, or projects that never got written up. Improving or repeating an existing project is often more realistic than starting from scratch.

Step 3: Scan the literature for gaps

Once you have a rough topic (e.g. VTE prophylaxis on your ward), do a quick search on PubMed or guidelines:

  • What has already been studied?
  • Are there controversies, conflicting results, or unanswered questions?
  • Are most studies from settings very different to yours?

You’re looking for places where the evidence is thin, outdated, or not applied well in real life.

Step 4: Turn problems into clear questions (PICO)

Use PICO to shape an idea into something researchable:

  • Population: who exactly (e.g. adult inpatients on the respiratory ward)?
  • Intervention: what change, exposure or tool (e.g. new VTE checklist)?
  • Comparison: current practice, previous year, another ward?
  • Outcome: what you’ll measure (e.g. % appropriately prescribed LMWH)?

If you can’t define at least Population and Outcome clearly, the idea probably needs more work.

Step 5: Check feasibility

A brilliant idea that you can’t finish is less useful than a simple project that gets completed and presented. Sense-check:

  • Can the data be collected from notes / EPR in the time you have?
  • Do you need ethics approval, or is it an audit / service evaluation?
  • Will you have support from a supervisor who can access data and sign forms?
  • Can you realistically analyse the data with your current skills (or help)?

Step 6: Shortlist and get feedback

Pick 2–3 ideas you’re most interested in. For each, write a one-line PICO question plus 3–4 bullet points on why it matters and how you would do it.

Take this mini-list to a consultant, registrar, or academic at your own university or hospital. People are much more likely to help if you arrive with specific, thought-through options rather than “do you have any projects?”.

Step 7: Capture ideas continuously

Keep a simple “ideas list” on your phone or laptop. Many good projects come from revisiting half-formed thoughts after you’ve seen the same problem a few more times. Add:

  • Brief description of the issue.
  • Where you saw it (ward, clinic, specialty).
  • Any guideline or paper you think links to it.

Final point

Remember that not every research project has to be the next ground breaking discovery. Science is built off lots of small steps that lead to greater change, audits, prospective analysis and literature reviews are a great way to help contribute to the wider scientific community!

Example: turning a ward problem into a project

Observed problem: On the respiratory ward you notice that VTE prophylaxis forms are often incomplete on admission, and some high-risk patients are missing LMWH. Initial thought: “Are we actually prescribing VTE prophylaxis correctly on this ward?” PICO-style question: In adult medical inpatients on the respiratory ward (Population), what proportion have appropriate VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribed (Outcome) according to trust guidelines (Intervention/current standard) over a 4-week period (Comparison = guideline standard / 100%)? Possible project: Retrospective notes review of all adult admissions over 4 weeks, measuring completion of risk assessments and appropriateness of prophylaxis. Present results at departmental meeting and design a simple intervention (e.g. admission proforma change or brief teaching), then re-audit later.